SMNI’s Lorraine Badoy and ‘Ka Eric’ : Talents Or Employees?

The controversy surrounding Lorraine T. Badoy and “Ka Eric” in relation to their status as talents versus employees of SMNI has ignited a debate amid congressional hearings seeking to cancel the broadcast franchise of SMNI.

The crux of the matter lies in the legal distinction between talents and employees, a precedent underscored by the Supreme Court in Jose Sonza v ABS-CBN Broadcasting Corporation (431 SCRA 583). The court ruled that a network’s lack of control over the means and methods by which a personality renders contracted services establishes the individual as an independent contractor rather than a network employee.

In this context, accusations of Badoy and Ka Eric spreading fake news should not be automatically attributed to SMNI, as they function as independent contractors. This legal perspective emphasizes the need for a nuanced approach in scrutinizing the alleged transgressions, ensuring that responsibility is assigned accurately while respecting the legal framework that delineates the relationship between networks and their contracted personalities.

Should we also ask whether Korina Sanchez, Boy Abunda, Vice Ganda and Dingdong Dantes are talents or employees of their respective networks?

Frailties That Degrade A Woman

In a plot twist that rivals the most absurd political dramas, former Senator Leila de Lima, recently freed on bail from a prolonged stint in the legal labyrinth, has reportedly decided to take legal action against bloggers who dared tarnish her womanly image. 

Because what’s love got to do with it, right? Apparently, everything. Forget about the drug-related charges that landed her in prison; it’s the bloggers’ unkind words that are the real crime against humanity.

It’s a perplexing strategy, considering de Lima’s own past justifications for her personal life. Didn’t she once attribute her romantic entanglements to the frailties of being a woman? Now, she’s playing the gender card to shield herself from criticism. Perhaps she forgot that she, too, contributed to the perpetuation of stereotypes by justifying her actions based on gender.

As the curtain rises on this legal spectacle, the audience eagerly awaits the reveal of these alleged blogger villains. Will they be Duterte loyalists, Marcos sympathizers, or perhaps just individuals with a penchant for satire? One thing’s for sure – in the theater of politics, the show must go on, even if the plot seems more fiction than reality.

PNA’s Selective News Headline

In a confusing twist of priorities, the Philippine News Agency (PNA) recently proclaimed the Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD) as the second-best government agency, according to an OCTA Research poll. One might wonder what happened to the headline that the Department of Education (DepEd) secured the top spot. Is the PNA, generously funded by Filipino taxpayers, harboring a mysterious beef with Vice President and DepEd Secretary Sara Duterte?

It seems the PNA has developed a knack for selective amnesia, conveniently forgetting to highlight the supposed numero uno status of DepEd. Is it a case of headline favoritism or a subtle political ploy? Perhaps the PNA has taken a page from beauty pageant reporting, where the emphasis is on the runner-up. In the Miss Universe analogy, one can imagine the PNA headline shouting, “Miss Thailand, a Marvelous First Runner-Up!” It appears the PNA has mastered the art of putting the spotlight on the second fiddle, leaving the nation to wonder if they’re playing a symphony of news or a comedic concerto.