In a groundbreaking move towards honesty in politics, some suggest that addressing legislators as “Honorable” should be entirely optional. After all, it seems a tad hypocritical to bestow such a noble title upon those who often exhibit behavior that is anything but honorable. 

Our esteemed Senators and Congressmen, in their illustrious display of virtue, demand our respect even as they engage in verbal jousts that would make a schoolyard bully blush.

Why should we be obliged to cloak them in the veneer of honor when their actions often resemble a circus more than a chamber of dignified discourse? 

One might argue that it’s time for a reality check. Perhaps if the title “Honorable” were treated as a merit badge, earned through actual honorable deeds and not just won through a popularity contest, the halls of Congress might echo with the harmonious sounds of respectful dialogue. 

Until then, let the optional “Honorable” be a reflection of the actual honor demonstrated, or lack thereof, in the grand spectacle of political theater.